Health care providers are required to deliver the desired level of care to the respective populations driven by professionalism (Thorton et al., 2015). However, sometimes, the healthcare providers may fail to observe the set guidelines leading to reduced quality of care. The primary frameworks which control the operations of the healthcare providers when it comes to the delivery of concern revolve around the nursing or medical principles, ethics, and but not limited to the oaths taken at the start of employment.
The nurses and practitioners from the other areas of interest are supposed to uphold the required level of ethics when undertaking their day to day activities based on the idea that their conduct should be in line with the requirements of the oaths that they took during employment. From a personal standpoint, certain population continue to receive different levels of care regardless of the promises that have been made by the practitioners. The main reason for this difference is the existence of issues such as bias, discrimination, and racism towards the selected community. These factors greatly assist in the reduction of the level of care delivered to the target communities in the long run.
In the healthcare sector, professionalism is a crucial principle that governs the behavior and actions carried out by the respective practitioners (Bynn & Thibault, 2018). However, unconscious bias, discrimination, and racism are some of the main factors which reduce the abilities to deliver quality care to specific communities. Unconscious bias revolves around the negative or positive prejudice against or in support of a given community, group of individual. In most cases, negative prejudice reduces the abilities of the practitioners to deliver quality services to the associated communities. On the other hand, discrimination is the idea of segregating certain people of groups in the community for the various attributes such as their area of origin or but not limited to the level of education. Discrimination does not provide a platform for equal opportunities for service delivery. As opposed, discrimination eliminates the chances of delivering quality care services to the associated populations. Finally, structural racism in healthcare is vital in that it reduces the chances of the delivery of services to specific populations. Racism reduces the abilities to deliver quality services to particular people or individuals based on cultural backgrounds.
These factors play a crucial role in that they influence the way people receive care. Racism, discrimination, and bias help to increase the disparities in the community as far as the provision of health services are concerned. On the other hand, the political systems that a nation contained a crucial role in defining the approaches to take when it comes to the delivery of care. The current political systems of a country positively contribute to the definition of the ultimate platform for guiding the activities and decisions made in the healthcare sector. Differences in perceptions usually create gaps in the healthcare decisions made influencing the delivery of care in the long run (Cruess & Cruess, 2016). Secondly, the economy of a country affects the quality of care delivered. For instance, a country with a strong and growing economy is highly likely to support the various pillars such as healthcare and education with the relevant resources. Further, the prevailing social connections of the community or healthcare industry influence the delivery of care. Negative social relationships result in reduced care delivery.
American Psychological Association. Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (6th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
Byyny, R. L., & Thibault, G. E. (2018). Medical professionalism in the modern era. Pharos, 81, 2-11.
Cruess, R. L., & Cruess, S. R. (2016). Professions and their Social Contracts: A Basis for Teaching Lessons of Professionalism from Medicine. In The Calling of Law (pp. 129-146). Routledge.
Thornton, R. H., Dauer, L. T., Shuk, E., Bylund, C. L., Banerjee, S. C., Maloney, E., … & Hay, J. (2015). Patient perspectives and preferences for communication of medical imaging risks in a cancer care setting. Radiology, 275(2), 545-552.
I enjoyed reading your post. Health care is a hot topic amongst all circles. If you watch the current political debates it is a constant topic. Affordable care Act, Medicare for all, Medicaid. It’s hard to know the right answer for all and the ins and outs of all the different policies that are in place. I think that insurance needs an overhaul. I think that socialized medicine does offer some benefits, but in the long run, I don’t think it is the best option. I think that there is a good meeting in the middle somewhere. I currently live in Germany, the land of socialized medicine, and it is not that great. For example, the area that I live in has 3 cardiologists, for the entire region. People wait 6 months for an appointment with a cardiologist. If they can’t wait they go to the ER. Some people pay thousands of Euros to move to the “front of the line”. People wait weeks and weeks and months to see a medical professional, even their PCM. The last 2 weeks of the year, they are all off. Germans pay 65% income tax which pays for the health care. The Germans in my region were just told that they now have to work an extra 5-10 years before they can retire because of the millions of uninsured immigrants they have taken into the country. I can’t imagine waiting months to see a specialist. I think that the Affordable care act provided a great start to providing health care to people, but at the same time, it is like it caused a reversal in coverage. People that had coverage before the ACA, lost coverage and people that did not have coverage gained coverage. I haven’t read much into the Medicare for all act, have you? what are your thoughts on it?
Insurance companies have too much power to say what they will pay for and if a treatment or medication is needed. They should never have that power. If a dr thinks someone needs it, then the insurance should pay for it. Administrations say that health care is so expensive because of coverage of the uninsured. Emergency room visits for the uninsured drive up health care costs. Health care costs are going to be driven up regardless I think. I think that state funded Medicaid programs have a much needed place in communities. I think that children from birth to 18, should have any medical treatment they need, medication they need and see any doctor or specialist they need/want. I think this is the case for all vulnerable populations. elderly, pregnant women, people who are sick or disabled. I don’t even know where to begin on what the right answer is, but nobody should have to suffer, and I believe that everyone has the right to good, quality health care.
Respond to the question above in BOLD based on the three paragraphs ABOVE it after reading the attachment.
Expert Solution Preview
Based on the provided content, it seems there is a discussion about healthcare delivery, professionalism, and the impact of bias, discrimination, and racism on the quality of care. The mention of political systems, economy, and social connections suggests a broader examination of the factors influencing healthcare provision.
In response to the question about the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and Medicare for all, it is important to note that healthcare policies and systems can have both positive and negative implications. The ACA aimed to expand access to healthcare coverage and reduce the number of uninsured individuals in the United States. While it did provide coverage to many who were previously uninsured, it also resulted in some individuals losing their coverage due to changes in requirements and affordability. It is essential to critically evaluate the impact of such policies to identify areas that need improvement and ensure equitable access to healthcare for all.
As for Medicare for all, an in-depth analysis of the specific proposed legislation is necessary to form a comprehensive judgment. This type of healthcare system, often associated with socialized medicine, can offer benefits such as universal coverage and reduced administrative costs. However, as mentioned in the content, it can also lead to long wait times for specialist care and potential strain on medical resources. Balancing access, quality, and sustainability is crucial when considering healthcare reform initiatives.
The issue of insurance companies having significant control over treatment decisions and coverage is also raised. It is concerning when insurance companies wield too much power in determining what treatments and medications are covered. Collaboration between healthcare providers, insurance companies, and policymakers is needed to ensure that medical decisions are based on sound medical evidence and patient needs rather than financial considerations.
Overall, the complexity of healthcare systems and policies requires thoughtful analysis and a balanced approach. It is crucial to consider the perspectives of various stakeholders, evaluate the impact of different policies, and work towards a healthcare system that ensures access to quality care for all individuals.